Skip to content
← Directory

Weight & Metabolic

AOD-9604

aka AOD9604 · hGH fragment 176-191 · growth hormone fragment 176-191 · Tyr-hGH 177-191 · anti-obesity drug 9604 · aod · frag 176-191 · fat burning fragment

C

Grade

A synthetic fragment of growth hormone designed to burn fat without the hormone's side effects, but human trials showed it failed to produce meaningful weight loss and development was abandoned.

Class
Synthetic peptide; modified C-terminal fragment of human growth hormone (residues 176-191, with an added N-terminal tyrosine)
Evidence
Grade C · Early / limited human data
Last reviewed
2026-06
C

Grade C · Early / limited human data

Why this grade

AOD-9604 was taken through a genuine clinical programme, rare for a grey-market peptide: six human trials in roughly 900 people, run by Metabolic Pharmaceuticals between 2001 and 2006. An early Phase 2a (about 300 obese adults, 12 weeks) showed a small but statistically significant weight loss. The larger, pivotal Phase 2b (about 536 adults, 24 weeks) failed to beat placebo, and drug development was abandoned in 2007. Substantial human evidence exists, but it points to no clinically meaningful weight loss. Graded C (limited human data that did not pan out) because there is no ongoing credible programme and no positive pivotal result; not D because real RCTs exist.

01

What is it?

Growth hormone is a large natural hormone. Scientists identified a small tail-end piece thought to be responsible for fat-burning, without the side effects of the full hormone like raised blood sugar. AOD-9604 is a synthetic copy of that piece. It worked in mice. Unlike most peptides sold online, it was tested properly in hundreds of real people, which is unusual. In the decisive trial, however, it did not produce more weight loss than a dummy injection. The company gave up on it in 2007. Today it's sold online as a 'research chemical', not as an approved medicine.

It's a rare grey-market peptide that actually entered clinical development. It sat the real exams (proper human trials) and failed the decisive one. The fat-burning story that looked good in mice did not show up convincingly when hundreds of real people were tested, so the company that owned it withdrew. That it is 'safe' is true but beside the point. A sugar pill is also safe.
02

How is it meant to work?

Designed as the isolated lipolytic fragment of human growth hormone (C-terminal residues 176-191 plus an added N-terminal tyrosine). In rodent and in-vitro models it stimulated lipolysis, inhibited lipogenesis and increased beta-3 adrenoceptor expression in adipocytes. Its lipolytic effect was lost in beta-3-AR knock-out mice, implying beta-3-AR signalling is required, though the peptide does not appear to be a direct receptor agonist. Across human trials it did not raise IGF-1 and did not impair glucose metabolism. The intended selling point was fat loss without growth hormone's metabolic downsides. However, the mechanism that worked in mice did not translate into clinically meaningful fat loss in the pivotal human trial.

03

What's it studied for?

Research contexts. Not proven uses, and not recommendations.

Obesity / body-fat reduction (the original drug indication; failed in the pivotal human trial)Hypercholesterolaemia and metabolic parameters (exploratory)Cartilage repair / osteoarthritis (later preclinical interest, not part of the original obesity programme)
04

Does the human evidence stack up?

Substantial for a peptide of this type, but negative on efficacy. Metabolic Pharmaceuticals ran six human clinical trials (2001-2006) involving roughly 893-900 participants. An earlier Phase 2a multicentre RCT in obese adults (about 300 people over 12 weeks) reported a small but statistically significant weight loss (roughly 2.6 kg at the active dose vs ~0.8 kg for placebo). The safety profile was reassuring: adverse events comparable to placebo, no effect on IGF-1, no adverse effect on glucose or insulin. The larger pivotal Phase 2b trial (about 536 people over 24 weeks) did not show statistically significant weight loss over placebo. The company terminated development as a weight-loss drug around 2007. The human data do not support a clinically meaningful effect on body weight or fat mass.

05

What could go wrong?

  • !Efficacy is the core problem. The pivotal human trial failed and the drug was abandoned in 2007. The marketing pitch ('GH fat-burning without the downsides') was not borne out in people.
  • !Marketing emphasises mouse and in-vitro data and the favourable safety profile while omitting the negative human efficacy result.
  • !GRAS status is routinely misrepresented online as a weight-loss approval. It is a US food-ingredient self-affirmation category and says nothing about clinical efficacy as a drug.
  • !Sold as an unlicensed 'research chemical' labelled 'not for human consumption'. Purity, concentration, sterility and even peptide identity are unverified in grey-market products.
  • !Banned in sport under WADA S0 (non-approved substances). Athletes face sanctions.
  • !No long-term human safety data beyond the original trial follow-up periods. Injectable use carries sterility and injection-site risks.
06

Is it legal in the UK?

Not a licensed medicine in the UK. AOD-9604 has no Marketing Authorisation from the MHRA, EMA or FDA for any indication. It is an unlicensed, investigational compound whose drug development was discontinued. Selling or supplying it with therapeutic or weight-loss claims without authorisation breaches the Human Medicines Regulations 2012. In practice it is sold online as an unlicensed 'research chemical' labelled 'not for human consumption', a framing used to sidestep medicines law. It is also prohibited in sport under the WADA Prohibited List (category S0, non-approved substances).

07

Key trials

  • · Phase 2a· Completed; small but statistically significant weight-loss signal reported

    Metabolic Pharmaceuticals AOD-9604 obesity programme: early Phase 2a multicentre RCT in obese adults

    About 300 obese adults over ~12 weeks; active dose lost ~2.6 kg vs ~0.8 kg placebo; safety comparable to placebo.

  • · Phase 2b· Completed; failed primary efficacy endpoint

    Metabolic Pharmaceuticals AOD-9604 pivotal Phase 2b obesity trial

    About 536 adults over ~24 weeks; failed to show statistically significant weight loss vs placebo; led to termination of drug development around 2007. NCT identifier not confirmed.

08

Sources

  1. 01
    The effects of human GH and its lipolytic fragment (AOD9604) on lipid metabolism following chronic treatment in obese mice and beta(3)-AR knock-out mice — Heffernan MA, Summers RJ, Thorburn AW, et al., Endocrinology (2001)

    Landmark preclinical paper establishing the lipolytic effect and beta-3-AR dependence in mice; the strongest positive (animal) evidence. PMID not independently confirmed here, so a PubMed search link is given.

  2. 02
    Safety and Tolerability of the Hexadecapeptide AOD9604 in Humans — Stier H, Vos E, Kenley D, Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2013;3(1-2):7-15

    Pooled safety analysis across the six human trials (~893 subjects): adverse events indistinguishable from placebo, no effect on IGF-1, no adverse effect on glucose/insulin. Supports the safety claims; says nothing positive about efficacy.

  3. 03
    The effect of AOD9604 on weight loss in obese adults: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study — Stier H, et al., Reported clinical trial (Metabolic Pharmaceuticals Phase 2 programme)

    The early human RCT reporting a small, statistically significant weight-loss signal; the later pivotal Phase 2b trial failed. Exact identifier not confirmed, so a descriptive citation with a PubMed search link is given.

  4. 04
    WADA statement on substance AOD-9604, World Anti-Doping Agency (2013)

    Confirms prohibited status in sport under S0 (non-approved substances), 22 April 2013.

Related

Stay posted

Follow AOD-9604

We'll email you only when AOD-9604's evidence actually changes — a new human trial, a grade change, a safety signal. No spam, nothing for sale.

WTPWhat's That Peptide?

The honest, UK guide to research peptides. We index the evidence, explain the mechanisms, and grade every one by a single question: how much do we actually know in humans?

Our promise

  • Nothing for sale
  • No money from vendors
  • No dosing, ever
  • Every claim cited

The honest brief

Occasional. Honest. Never for sale.

New entries, grade changes and the odd reality check — no spam.

Not medical advice. An educational reference about research peptides for a UK audience. Most peptides here are not licensed medicines in the UK, and nothing on this site tells you to obtain, possess or use any substance. Talk to a qualified clinician before any health decision. Read the full disclaimer.

© 2026 What's That Peptide

Built by stumason.dev